Temozolomide and Radiotherapy versus Radiotherapy Alone in Patients with Glioblastoma, IDH -wildtype: Post Hoc Analysis of the EORTC Randomized Phase III CATNON Trial

authors

• Garnier Louis
• Vidal Chrystelle
• Chinot Olivier
• Cohen-Jonathan Moyal Elisabeth
• Djelad Apolline
• Bronnimann Charlotte
• Bekaert Lien
• Taillandier Luc
• Frenel Jean-Sébastien
• Langlois Olivier
• Colin Philippe
• Menei Philippe
• Dhermain Frédéric
• Carpentier Catherine
• Gerazime Aurélie
• Curtit Elsa
• Figarella-Branger Dominique
• Dehais Caroline
• Ducray François

keywords

• Anaplastic oligodendroglioma
• Age
• Seizure
• Karnofsky Performance Status
• Proliferation
• Radiotherapy
• Chemotherapy
• Surgery

document type

abstract

In a post hoc analysis of the CATNON trial (NCT00626990), we explored whether adding temozolomide to radiotherapy improves outcome in patients with IDH1/2 wildtype (wt) anaplastic astrocytomas with molecular features of glioblastoma [redesignated as glioblastoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase–wildtype (IDH-wt) in the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of central nervous system tumors]. Patients and Methods: From the randomized phase III CATNON study examining the addition of adjuvant and concurrent temozolomide to radiotherapy in anaplastic astrocytomas, we selected a subgroup of IDH1/2wt and H3F3Awt tumors with presence of TERT promoter mutations and/or EGFR amplifications and/or combined gain of chromosome 7 and loss of chromosome 10. Molecular abnormalities including MGMT promoter methylation status were determined by next-generation sequencing, DNA methylation profiling, and SNaPshot analysis. Results: Of the 751 patients entered in the CATNON study, 670 had fully molecularly characterized tumors. A total of 159 of these tumors met the WHO 2021 molecular criteria for glioblastoma, IDH-wt. Of these patients, 47 received radiotherapy only and 112 received a combination of radiotherapy and temozolomide. There was no added effect of temozolomide on either overall survival [HR, 1.19; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.82–1.71] or progression-free survival (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.61–1.24). MGMT promoter methylation was prognostic for overall survival, but was not predictive for outcome to temozolomide treatment either with respect to overall survival or progression-free survival. Conclusions: In this cohort of patients with glioblastoma, IDH-wt temozolomide treatment did not add benefit beyond that observed from radiotherapy, regardless of MGMT promoter status. These findings require a new well-powered prospective clinical study to explore the efficacy of temozolomide treatment in this patient population.

more information