Therapeutic implications of improved molecular diagnostics for rare CNS-embryonal tumor entities: results of an international, retrospective study

authors

  • von Hoff Katja
  • Haberler Christine
  • Schmitt-Hoffner Felix
  • Schepke Elizabeth
  • de Rojas Teresa
  • Jacobs Sandra
  • Zapotocky Michal
  • Sumerauer David
  • Perek-Polnik Marta
  • Dufour Christelle
  • van Vuurden Dannis
  • Slavc Irene
  • Gojo Johannes
  • Pickles Jessica
  • Gerber Nicolas
  • Massimino Maura
  • Gil-Da-Costa Maria Joao
  • Garami Miklos
  • Kumirova Ella
  • Sehested Astrid
  • Scheie David
  • Cruz Ofelia
  • Moreno Lucas
  • Cho Jaeho
  • Zeller Bernward
  • Bovenschen Niels
  • Grotzer Michael
  • Alderete Daniel
  • Snuderl Matija
  • Zheludkova Olga
  • Golanov Andrey
  • Okonechnikov Konstantin
  • Mynarek Martin
  • Juhnke B Ole
  • Rutkowski Stefan
  • Schüller Ulrich
  • Pizer Barry
  • Zezschwitz Barbara
  • Kwiecien Robert
  • Wechsung Maximilian
  • Konietschke Frank
  • Hwang Eugene
  • Sturm Dominik
  • Pfister Stefan
  • von Deimling Andreas
  • Rushing Elisabeth
  • Ryzhova Marina
  • Hauser Peter
  • Łastowska Maria
  • Wesseling Pieter
  • Giangaspero Felice
  • Hawkins Cynthia
  • Figarella‑branger Dominique
  • Eberhart Charles
  • Burger Peter
  • Gessi Marco
  • Korshunov Andrey
  • Jacques Tom
  • Capper David
  • Pietsch Torsten
  • Kool Marcel

document type

ART

abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Only few data are available on treatment-associated behavior of distinct rare CNS-embryonal tumor entities previously treated as “CNS-primitive neuroectodermal tumors” (CNS-PNET). Respective data on specific entities, including CNS neuroblastoma, FOXR2 activated (CNS NB-FOXR2), and embryonal tumor with multi-layered rosettes (ETMR) are needed for development of differentiated treatment strategies. METHODS Within this retrospective, international study, tumor samples of clinically well-annotated patients with the original diagnosis of CNS-PNET were analyzed using DNA methylation arrays (n=307). Additional cases (n=66) with DNA methylation pattern of CNS NB-FOXR2 were included irrespective of initial histological diagnosis. Pooled clinical data (n=292) were descriptively analyzed. RESULTS DNA methylation profiling of “CNS-PNET” classified 58(19%) cases as ETMR, 57(19%) as HGG, 36(12%) as CNS NB-FOXR2, and 89(29%) cases were classified into 18 other entities. Sixty-seven (22%) cases did not show DNA methylation patterns similar to established CNS tumor reference classes. Best treatment results were achieved for CNS NB-FOXR2 patients (5-year PFS: 63%±7%, OS: 85%±5%, n=63), with 35/42 progression-free survivors after upfront craniospinal irradiation (CSI) and chemotherapy. The worst outcome was seen for ETMR and HGG patients with 5-year PFS of 18%±6% and 22%±7%, and 5-year OS of 24%±6% and 25%±7%, respectively. CONCLUSION The historically reported poor outcome of CNS-PNET patients becomes highly variable when tumors are molecularly classified based on DNA methylation profiling. Patients with CNS NB-FOXR2 responded well to current treatments and a standard-risk-CSI based regimen may be prospectively evaluated. The poor outcome of ETMR across applied treatment strategies substantiates the necessity for evaluation of novel treatments.

more information